Guan Yu leads by 9.3 pts · 2 figures compared

General · Ancient

General · Ancient
Guan Yu, serving under Cao Cao, killed the enemy general Yan Liang in battle at Boma. This act demonstrated his martial prowess and loyalty to Cao Cao at the time. The victory helped Cao Cao's forces in the campaign against Yuan Shao.
After learning of Liu Bei's whereabouts, Guan Yu left Cao Cao's service, crossing five passes and killing six generals to rejoin his sworn brother. This act of loyalty became legendary, symbolizing unwavering commitment to one's oath.
Guan Yu led a campaign against Cao Cao's forces at Fancheng. He achieved initial success, flooding the city, but was ultimately defeated by reinforcements led by Xu Huang. This battle marked the turning point in his military career.
After the defeat at Fancheng, Guan Yu retreated but was ambushed and captured by Sun Quan's general L
Zhang Han, as a Qin general, led a force of convicts and slaves to defeat the rebel army of Chen Sheng and Wu Guang at Chen County. He then pursued and killed Chen Sheng, temporarily stabilizing Qin control.
Zhang Han defeated the Chu rebel army led by Xiang Liang at Dingtao. Xiang Liang was killed in the battle. This victory temporarily reversed rebel gains and restored Qin authority in the region.
Zhang Han's army was besieged at Julu by the rebel forces of Xiang Yu. After a prolonged siege and the destruction of Qin supply lines, Zhang Han's army was defeated. He surrendered to Xiang Yu.
Zhang Han surrendered his remaining 200,000 troops to Xiang Yu at Xianyang. Despite the surrender, Xiang Yu executed Zhang Han and had his army buried alive. This ended the last major Qin military resistance.
Each figure is scored on 6 dimensions (0—100 scale) based on structured historical data: Military (10%), Political (20%), Influence (20%), Legacy (20%), Leadership (15%), Strategy (15%). The weighted total produces the final ranking.
Scores are computed from structured sub-indicators in the database. Scale factors adjust for era (Ancient ×0.85, Modern ×1.0) and civilization size (Eastern ×1.05, Other ×0.80) to account for differences in population and military scale.
Comparisons are limited to 2—3 figures to ensure readability and statistical meaningfulness.
±5 points per dimension — Sub-scores are derived from historical records with inherent uncertainty. Two figures within 5 points on a dimension should be considered roughly equivalent in that area.
±3 points overall — The weighted combination of 6 dimensions produces a total score with approximately ±3 points of uncertainty. Differences of less than 3 points are not statistically significant— the figures are effectively tied.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!