Qu Yuan leads by 10.7 pts · 2 figures compared

Politician · Ancient

Politician · Ancient
Qu Yuan was banished from the Chu court by King Huai of Chu due to slander from rival officials. This exile removed him from political influence and led to his wandering in the southern regions of Chu.
During his exile, Qu Yuan wrote the Li Sao, a long autobiographical poem expressing his sorrow and loyalty to Chu. This work became a foundational text of Chinese literature and the Chu Ci anthology.
Upon hearing that the Qin army had captured the Chu capital Ying, Qu Yuan drowned himself in the Miluo River. This act of protest against political corruption is commemorated annually by the Dragon Boat Festival.
Wei Xuan was appointed governor of Nanyang Commandery, where he implemented administrative reforms. He focused on improving local governance and reducing corruption among officials.
Wei Xuan proposed and implemented reforms to the Han taxation system, aiming to reduce the burden on peasants and increase state revenue. He adjusted tax rates and improved collection methods, which helped stabilize the rural economy.
Wei Xuan was promoted to Minister of Finance (Da Sinong) in the central government. In this role, he oversaw the national budget and continued his efforts to streamline fiscal policies, earning a reputation for integrity.
Wei Xuan retired from public office due to declining health. His retirement marked the end of a career dedicated to fiscal reform and honest administration, and he was remembered as a model official.
Each figure is scored on 6 dimensions (0—100 scale) based on structured historical data: Military (10%), Political (20%), Influence (20%), Legacy (20%), Leadership (15%), Strategy (15%). The weighted total produces the final ranking.
Scores are computed from structured sub-indicators in the database. Scale factors adjust for era (Ancient ×0.85, Modern ×1.0) and civilization size (Eastern ×1.05, Other ×0.80) to account for differences in population and military scale.
Comparisons are limited to 2—3 figures to ensure readability and statistical meaningfulness.
±5 points per dimension — Sub-scores are derived from historical records with inherent uncertainty. Two figures within 5 points on a dimension should be considered roughly equivalent in that area.
±3 points overall — The weighted combination of 6 dimensions produces a total score with approximately ±3 points of uncertainty. Differences of less than 3 points are not statistically significant— the figures are effectively tied.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!