Expert Analysis
Origins
**Aulus Plautius** was born around 15 BC into a prominent Roman senatorial family. His father, Aulus Plautius, served as suffect consul in 1 BC, and his brother, Quintus Plautius, was consul in AD 36. Plautius likely received the standard education of a Roman aristocrat, focusing on rhetoric, law, and military command. His early career included serving as a military tribune and holding quaestor and praetor positions under Tiberius and Caligula. In AD 43, Emperor Claudius appointed him to lead the invasion of Britain, a campaign that would define his career.
**Memnon of Rhodes** was born around 380 BC on the island of Rhodes, a maritime republic known for its skilled sailors and mercenaries. His brother Mentor also served as a mercenary commander for the Persian Empire. Memnon began his career serving the Persian satrap Artabazus II, who rebelled against Artaxerxes III. After Artabazus fled, Memnon was pardoned and continued to serve the Persian kings. He gained experience in both land and naval warfare, eventually becoming a key commander under Darius III. His family's mercenary background gave him a pragmatic, strategic mindset.
Rise to Power
Plautius rose through the Roman cursus honorum under Tiberius and Caligula. He served as governor of Pannonia around AD 42, where he gained military experience. His major turning point came in AD 43 when Claudius chose him to command the invasion of Britain. Claudius needed a military victory to strengthen his position, and Plautius was a reliable, experienced general. Plautius led four legions (Legio II Augusta, IX Hispana, XIV Gemina, and XX Valeria Victrix) plus auxiliaries, totaling about 40,000 men. He landed at Rutupiae (Richborough) and defeated the British tribes under Caratacus at the Battle of the Medway in AD 43. This victory allowed Claudius to join the campaign and receive the surrender of eleven British kings at Camulodunum.
Memnon rose to prominence as a mercenary commander in Persian service. He advised Artabazus II during his revolt but fled after it failed. Later, he was reconciled with the Persian court and served under Darius III. His key turning point came in 334 BC when Alexander the Great invaded Asia. Memnon advocated for a scorched earth strategy to deny supplies to the Macedonian army, but the Persian satraps rejected his plan. Instead, he was given command of the Persian fleet and successfully defended Halicarnassus in 334 BC, delaying Alexander's advance. He then launched a naval campaign to recapture Greek islands, threatening Alexander's supply lines.
Leadership & Governance
Plautius governed as the first Roman governor of Britain from AD 43 to 47. He established the province's administration, built roads and forts, and secured the loyalty of local tribes through treaties. His leadership style was methodical and disciplined, focusing on consolidating gains rather than reckless expansion. He left behind a network of forts and a pacified southeast. His governance score of 47.3 reflects his effective but limited administrative scope.
Memnon, as a mercenary commander, had little formal governance role but exercised strategic leadership. He advised Darius III and commanded Persian forces with a focus on naval warfare and guerrilla tactics. His strategy score of 66.3 is higher than Plautius's 55.0, reflecting his innovative use of the fleet and scorched earth. However, his political score of 27.9 is low because he never held high political office. Memnon's leadership was pragmatic, but he lacked the authority to fully implement his strategies.
Triumph & Tragedy
Plautius's greatest triumph was the successful invasion and conquest of southern Britain, leading to the establishment of the Roman province of Britannia. He captured Camulodunum, the tribal capital, and defeated Caratacus. His ovation in Rome was a rare honor. His tragedy was that his conquest was incomplete; tribes in Wales and the north remained unsubdued. He also faced a rebellion in AD 47 from the Iceni tribe. He returned to Rome and faded into obscurity, with his later life unknown.
Memnon's triumph was the defense of Halicarnassus, where he used fortified positions and naval sorties to delay Alexander for months. His naval campaign recaptured Chios and Lesbos, threatening Alexander's supply lines. His tragedy was his death from illness in 333 BC during the siege of Mytilene. Had he lived, his strategy of attacking Alexander's rear might have changed the course of the war. His advice to use scorched earth was ignored by the Persian court, a strategic error that contributed to Alexander's success.
Character & Destiny
Plautius was a disciplined, reliable Roman general who followed orders and executed a complex amphibious invasion. His character was methodical rather than brilliant, reflected in his military score of 82.0 and leadership of 47.3. He was not a political schemer, which is why his political score is only 25.0. His destiny was to be a tool of Claudius's ambition, achieving a significant conquest but not rising to higher office.
Memnon was a strategic thinker, willing to adopt unconventional tactics like scorched earth and naval raids. His strategy score of 66.3 is higher than Plautius's 55.0, but his lower military score of 52.5 reflects his limited field command. His death at the height of his success prevented him from fully implementing his plans. His destiny was to be a 'what if' figure in Alexander's conquests.
Legacy
Plautius's legacy is the Roman conquest of Britain, which lasted nearly 400 years. He established the province's infrastructure and military presence. His name is less known than later governors, but his invasion was a pivotal event. His influence score of 57.2 reflects his role in expanding the Roman Empire. He is remembered primarily in historical accounts of the Claudian invasion.
Memnon's legacy is as the one general who came closest to stopping Alexander. His defensive tactics and naval strategy influenced later military thought. His advice, if followed, might have prevented Alexander's conquest of Persia. He is studied in military history for his strategic acumen. His influence score of 50.2 is slightly lower than Plautius's.
Conclusion
Aulus Plautius had a greater historical impact than Memnon of Rhodes. His conquest of Britain added a major province to the Roman Empire that endured for centuries, shaping the course of British history. Memnon's strategies were brilliant but ultimately failed to stop Alexander, and his early death left his plans unfulfilled. Plautius's military score of 82.0 and total score of 51.3 exceed Memnon's 52.5 and 43.9, reflecting his more tangible achievements. While Memnon was a more innovative strategist, Plautius's concrete results give him the edge.