Thrasybulus leads by 11.7 pts · 2 figures compared

General · Ancient

General · Ancient
Ma Yuan led a Han army to suppress the Trung Sisters' rebellion in Jiaozhi (modern Vietnam). He defeated the rebel forces, executed the Trung sisters, and reestablished Han control. The campaign extended Han influence into Southeast Asia.
Ma Yuan campaigned against the Wuhuan and Xianbei nomadic confederations in the north. He secured the Han frontier by defeating these groups and establishing defensive measures. His campaigns stabilized the northern border for decades.
Ma Yuan died of illness while leading a campaign against the Wulin tribes in southern China. His last words reportedly expressed regret that he could not complete the mission. His death exemplified his dedication to military service until the end.
After Ma Yuan's death, his political enemies accused him of corruption and failure. Emperor Guangwu posthumously stripped Ma Yuan of his titles and confiscated his property. His family was disgraced until later emperors rehabilitated his reputation.
Thrasybulus led a force of exiles from Thebes to defeat the forces of the Thirty Tyrants at Munychia in Piraeus. The victory killed the tyrant Critias and opened the way for the restoration of democracy in Athens.
After the initial victory, Thrasybulus faced a counterattack by the oligarchic forces at Piraeus. He successfully defended the port city, securing the democratic faction's control and forcing the Thirty Tyrants to flee to Eleusis.
Thrasybulus negotiated a general amnesty (the 'Oath of Amnesty') that allowed the return of exiles and the peaceful restoration of democratic institutions. This reconciliation prevented further civil strife and is considered a model of political forgiveness.
Thrasybulus led an Athenian fleet to recover cities in the Aegean and the Hellespont. He restored Athenian influence and collected tribute, but his methods were criticized for being heavy-handed. He was killed in a night attack at Aspendus.
Each figure is scored on 6 dimensions (0—100 scale) based on structured historical data: Military (10%), Political (20%), Influence (20%), Legacy (20%), Leadership (15%), Strategy (15%). The weighted total produces the final ranking.
Scores are computed from structured sub-indicators in the database. Scale factors adjust for era (Ancient ×0.85, Modern ×1.0) and civilization size (Eastern ×1.05, Other ×0.80) to account for differences in population and military scale.
Comparisons are limited to 2—3 figures to ensure readability and statistical meaningfulness.
±5 points per dimension — Sub-scores are derived from historical records with inherent uncertainty. Two figures within 5 points on a dimension should be considered roughly equivalent in that area.
±3 points overall — The weighted combination of 6 dimensions produces a total score with approximately ±3 points of uncertainty. Differences of less than 3 points are not statistically significant— the figures are effectively tied.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!