An Lushan leads by 10.2 pts · 2 figures compared

General · Medieval

General · Medieval
An Lushan was appointed military governor (jiedushi) of Fanyang, one of the most powerful frontier commands. He built a personal army composed of Han Chinese, Khitan, and other ethnic groups, amassing significant military power.
An Lushan declared rebellion against Emperor Xuanzong, claiming he was removing the corrupt chancellor Yang Guozhong. He led his army south from Fanyang, capturing Luoyang and declaring himself Emperor of the Great Yan dynasty.
After defeating Tang forces at Tong Pass, An Lushan's army captured the Tang capital Chang'an. Emperor Xuanzong fled to Sichuan, and the city was looted. This marked the peak of An Lushan's power.
An Lushan was assassinated by his son An Qingxu and a eunuch named Li Zhu'er. His failing health and erratic behavior had alienated his inner circle, leading to the coup. An Qingxu succeeded him as emperor of Yan.
Li Sheng fought in the later stages of the An Lushan Rebellion, contributing to the suppression of rebel forces. His early military career established his reputation as a capable commander.
Li Sheng led Tang loyalist forces to recapture the capital Chang'an from the rebel Zhu Ci. This victory restored the Tang emperor to the throne and ended the Zhu Ci Rebellion, cementing Li Sheng's reputation as a key military figure.
Following his recapture of Chang'an, Li Sheng was appointed as Grand General and given high honors by Emperor Dezong. This appointment recognized his crucial role in saving the dynasty.
Each figure is scored on 6 dimensions (0—100 scale) based on structured historical data: Military (10%), Political (20%), Influence (20%), Legacy (20%), Leadership (15%), Strategy (15%). The weighted total produces the final ranking.
Scores are computed from structured sub-indicators in the database. Scale factors adjust for era (Ancient ×0.85, Modern ×1.0) and civilization size (Eastern ×1.05, Other ×0.80) to account for differences in population and military scale.
Comparisons are limited to 2—3 figures to ensure readability and statistical meaningfulness.
±5 points per dimension — Sub-scores are derived from historical records with inherent uncertainty. Two figures within 5 points on a dimension should be considered roughly equivalent in that area.
±3 points overall — The weighted combination of 6 dimensions produces a total score with approximately ±3 points of uncertainty. Differences of less than 3 points are not statistically significant— the figures are effectively tied.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!